Discussion:Errors and Omissions insurance

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Business Growth Community --> Errors and Omissions insurance


Dclearyea (talk|edits) said:

23 April 2006
Any ideas on EA/CPA's carrying some type of errors and ommissions/professional liability insurance and where to obtain it? With so much litigation taking place these days, it's better to be protected, but I was wondering if it's necessary and what type of liability would an accountant be subject to if litigation took place? I'm an EA and have been in practice for 15+ years (schedule C sole proprietor) and never had a problem, but I guess it's better to be safe than sorry. Any ideas on an insurance company to check out? Also, would incorporating help regarding protection? Thanks for the info.

ArchCPA (talk|edits) said:

24 April 2006
I'm a CPA and I've my E&O insurance through CPAI (Aon Insurance Agency). If you're a tax preparer (CPA/EA/any other), it's imperitive that you get some kind of insurance to cover malpractice. Limits of liability depends on the kind of returns you do. I deal with clients who are millionaire, and so my limits are higher. Check out this website and get a free online quote: www.cpai.com. If you haven't been subject to lititation in the last 15 years, consider youself lucky. You never know when a lawsuit can strike you, expecially when the tax code is so complex.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

24 April 2006
Get something. I have coverage strictly for tax. I've never had a suit in 20 years, only one that might have been a close call, but gave free services to make up for an error. And twice that I feared I'd have to use the policy due to potential penalty. I was able to get the penalties waived, tho'. But it can add up pretty fast, and agree that with the complexity of the law, errors are inevitable.

Dclearyea (talk|edits) said:

24 April 2006
Thank you all so much for your help. I will check out obtaining the insurance.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

25 April 2006
If you do just individuals, and you make a mistake, you are really liable just for a few bucks:

penalties and interests. It is not a big deal. My ex- boss at JH does not carry any insurance liability. He used to tell to the client: "Okey- Probably my preparer did that mistake. I'm not sure. Lets say he did it. Considerer the extra refund as a free loan. I'm willing to pay for the consecuences of our mistake. In the IRS letter you can read that: "Penalties $100.00 Interests: $78.00 But the federal income tax due is your and you have to pay that amount from your own pocket. Also, we amend your return for free , and we refund the fees you paid to us for a preparation that was wrong. Other situation, of courses if you are dealing with corporations, wages, and the trust fund

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

25 April 2006
Oh, Martineo, and I assume that that's Martin County, not your name...surprise surprise surprise. Ever hear of the negligence penalty when taxes are off by 20% or more? Quite stiff my friend. So if your client's tax shows 5k but it should have been 6k, you're whacked with about a thousand dollar US penalty unless you can find reasonable cause for it to be waived. I found E&O insurance for about $250 per year. Easy call.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

25 April 2006
Martineo is part of my real last name: Martinez- I'm also living in Martin County- A coincidence.

I did not hear about the negligence penalty. Well,now I think I read about it- after all, I had to read thousands of pages to become an EA- (But obviously, I cannot remember all detais moist of the time) Thank you for telling me that the stuff exists. I dont understand where the thousand dollars came from. The 20% is aplied on what? Also, I never heart of a preparer that got that penalty. Then, My conclusion: It is unlikely to be involved in that situation. Insurance premium, I have a license, is based on probabilities. I don't recommend do not carry E and O liability insurance. Just that it should be sheaper- as you notice- and Arch CPA said if you just do personal returns. I respect your credentaisl JR1- I'm learning a lot reading your posts and other people's post too. See you.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

April 26, 2006
I strongly recommend E&O insurance for every paid tax preparer, bookkeeper and accountant. Some people out there still think that just because a professional is looking at the numbers, they should catch any potential problems with the books. Fraud is more common than most people realize. My practice is relatively small, yet I have three clients who've been victims of fraud (one non-profit, one service provider and one contractor). For $500/year or less, it's worth the comfort knowing you have something to fall back on if someone does decide to sue. By the way, the "corporate veil" will not protect you in the event that someone sues you for negligence.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

26 April 2006
I'm agree with Natalie- Would you, please, tell us how that fraud was commited?

I got two clients with - I'm almost sure about that- bogus numbers. One of them, brought me a fake W2, and probably a fake FL Driver License. Just one case, but there are a ring in Florida doing that. Another cliente came with his 1040 done- self employee- No 1099 Misc. A dependend child... He want to get a rapid refund... I refused to process a Rapid Anticipation Loan- I knew it would be rejected by the bank-- and He refused to pay i n advance. Three years ago... I tell you later

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

May 2, 2006
Nonprofit organization -- small organization in which Treasurer and Exec. Director handled most of the management functions. Volunteers staffed a gift shop. Volunteer quit. Locks were not changed. Pass codes to enter building were not changed. Over approximately 2 - 3 years small amounts of cash were taken. Incidently, cash was not locked up and deposits were made every one to two weeks. My services include an annual compilation of the financial statements and preparation of the Form 990. I noticed "petty cash" was building and had a meeting with the Treasurer. We reviewed transactions during the year (QuickBooks) and noted they were recorded properly. I mentioned the "f" word, but the Treasurer refused to believe it. Then he mentioned that, oh yes, he did notice money was taken twice earlier in the year. Bingo. I estimated about $3,700 was taken, or about 4% of total assets.


Service company -- another small operation with only the owner and office manager. Office manager had a lot of autonomy. Owner was smart in that he had bank statements mailed to his P.O. box address. He reviewed statements carefully. One brokerage account was sent directly to the office, however. You know how you can pay credit cards online and all you need to enter is the bank account and routing numbers? Well, that's what she did. Except that she paid per personal cards with company funds. Then when that wasn't caught, she started forging checks on this brokerage account. Transactions were posted to "draws" to avoid scrutiny from tax preparer. (I provided other accounting services to this client.) Owner started wondering why there was a cash flow problem when he was actually making more money than the prior year. Brokerage company ended up calling office manager and asked her about a particular check, which tipped her off that she was being checked out. Total amount taken estimated to be about $40,000 over about nine months. (This one should really make you want to protect your bank account numbers!)


Contractor -- entrepreneur client set up a separate wholesaling business and hired close acquaintance as manager. Business was going well, and manager realized he could make more money if he took sales directly. He set up another company with a similar name, opened new checking account, etc. Client has a big network and found out what manager was up to. Activity was pretty much nipped in the bud.


It's really amazing what some people will attempt to do!

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2006
Interesting- Thank you. Mastermind criminals. The last one was clever.

Five years ago, I was in a check cashing store dealing with anykind of "crazy" guys

Warren (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2006
Farmer - client had bank statement mailed to P.O. Box but had employee pick it up and bring it back to the office unopened. Employee was opening bank statement and removing his forged checks to himself and replacing them with dummy checks to vendors and then resealing the bank statement. Employee had ordered duplicate series of checks in the same number sequence and color and even when to the extent of copying the bank stamps on to the bank of his dummy checks. My office just did the tax return for this client and we caught the embezzlement in the 2nd year. Employee got away with $750,000 but did get convicted and sent to prison Client did not recover any funds, did not sue, and remains a client.

Beengel (talk|edits) said:

May 4, 2006
Speaking of insurance, for those practicing out of their homes, I suggest liablility insurance as well. You never know if somene will slip. Adding this to our home owner policy was only about $60 a year, and covers customers coming to the home. Since the number is minimal, and in my case pretty seasonal, it is not very expensive, and most home owner's policies will not cover a loss associated with a business out of the home.

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

7 May 2006
Hi Beengel: Are practicioners allowed to e file from home?

I thought we need an occupational license to do business. And , then, you need to live in certain areas to get that license. Maybe I will start an entreprise in that way.

Inagpurwala (talk|edits) said:

8 May 2006
Martineo: Are you talking about permision/authorization from IRS? For E-file from home you do not need any special permision. Myself and many others are e-filing from home. Yes you will need license from city if you are doing business out of your home.Inagpurwala 21:57, 7 May 2006 (CDT)

Martineo (talk|edits) said:

8 May 2006
Thank you.

Two years ago, I got e-filin authorization from the IRS. I think we need that. And, What kind of license from the city- Occupational?

Inagpurwala (talk|edits) said:

8 May 2006
Martineo:

Many cities requires Business License to do any kind of Business in the city. Also you may be asked to file for "zonig change" for your residence from residential to commercial (it is required in Fremont, CA, where I am). You should check with your city office for what things you might need. Thanks.Inagpurwala 10:39, 8 May 2006 (CDT)

Lalva (talk|edits) said:

9 May 2006
Going back to the original question, liability insurance: Does anyone know about a place where to buy Tax Preparer liability ins? Not for CPAs, only for Tax preparers? I checked the CPAI one but I am not a CPA.

MMtoEA (talk|edits) said:

9 May 2006
Lalva, here are a couple of suggestions: EZ Insurance Solutions--www.ezinssolutions.com and Placer Insurance Agency--www.taxproeando.com.

Lois (talk|edits) said:

9 May 2006
I strongly agree with every reply - any preparer is totally insane not to have insurance! I would strong suggest that a sole prepare be set up as an LLC to cover those pesty little suits thast may come up. The cost of the LLC is the cheapest form of insurance possible. Remember when you prepare any type of taxes you are liable for anyone and everyone who uses them for financial decisions - that's a broad and vast exposure!

Insurance is based on the preparers in your firm and gross revenue - but don't go without it!!!

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

May 9, 2006
Lois - I'm not an attorney, but my understanding is that LLCs, LLPs and corporations will not protect a professional for any liability that is due to his/her own negligence. You might want to check with an attorney in your area or your state statutes.

Auditor (talk|edits) said:

25 July 2006
Hello. I am not a tax preparer, but I am a CPA. I perform audits for small financial services clients, and ocassionally some accounting work (though not those I also perform audits). I don't have E&O insurance, but I include an indemnification clause in my contracts. Do you recommend I also get the E&O as additional protection?

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

July 25, 2006
I would recommend you consult with an attorney. I would not be surprised if he or she recommended E&O insurance.

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

26 July 2006
Client promises to indemnify CPA against malpractice? Client goes belly up after CPA issues audited f/s. Lender is harmed. What good will the indemnification be? Yes, by all means, get prof liability insurance.

Dstain43 (talk|edits) said:

4 October 2006
I have done our own for years. I am now taking a tax preparation course and will work for a tax preparation service this tax season. Does one have to be a CPA to be an independent tax preparer? This discussion is interesting to read.

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2006
Dstain43 - your first season working for a tax prep service will be an eye opening experience! At present, the IRS has little/no restriction regarding who can be an independent paid tax preparer. Check with your state. Every state is different. Florida does not regulate this at all. My understanding (from TaxAlmanac) is that California and Hawaii do have some kind of regulation and/or licensing. American Institute of Professional Bookkeepers (AIPB.com) has a liability policy.

Jmor (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2006
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE CO THROUGH TARGET INSURANCE SERVICES FOR E AND O FOR TAX PRACTITIONERS ERRORS OR OMISSIONS LIABILITY INSURANCE IS THE CHEAPEST ONE THAT I HAVE FOUND FOR $165.00 A YEAR. IT HAS COVERAGE OF $10,000.00 FOR EACH OCCURENCE WITH AN AGGREGATE OF $20,000.00 OR YOU CAN GET A LARGE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE FOR A HIGHER COST.

Taxea (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2006
IRS only requires paid preparers to sign the return..unless you are an E.A then you are subject to continuing education to maintain your E.A. license.

Hawaii only requires you to get a General Excise Tax license (business license) which is a one time fee of $20. Then you pay the state 4.00% of your gross income. Each City in CA is different. But, most require a business license and gross income reports to the City plus a tax on your income. Then you have to have a state license too.

For Dstain43...I have an office in home but I go to my clients or the documents are emailed or scanned to me. If they come to the house it is only to drop off paperwork so no rezoning necessary. When I am done with the return I priority mail the packet to the client and when they send prep payment and signed 8879 I efile the return.

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

6 October 2006
Wow!! I knew I liked Florida!! I pay an occupational license of $37/year. Since I'm an S-Corp (costs $150.00 a year), there's no state income tax. That's it! No other taxes or fees to the state!

Valleytaxoffice (talk|edits) said:

27 November 2007
I have been using "Hartford Insurance" for many years now. With the complexities of taxes and the pressure during tax season it is impossible to get through the season without a mistake. I have been fortunate enough to catch them and call the taxpayer. Though, I have found that trying to do a "good deed" usually comes back to bite me. I have turned clients away when they try to get me to push the envelope too far. These clients are worth having. If anything goes wrong they are the very first to complain.

Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said:

27 November 2007
Create a corporation or an LLC in addition to insurance. Creating an LLC does not create any significant extra administration cost since it is ignored for federal tax purposes. The filing fee in your state is probably small ($175 in Washington). There is no reason not to do it.

John Huddleston http://huddlestontax.com

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

November 27, 2007
John are you recommending creating a corporation or LLC to limit liability exposure? If so, my understanding is that there really is not much benefit to tax preparers/CPAs etc. under these types of entities. These types of entities will protect an individual if someone slips on the office steps and hurts him or herself, but if there is an issue with the services provided, there is no protection. I think there is a term for this, but I do not know what it is.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

27 November 2007
I've heard of vicarious liability protection where one partners liability for negligence is limited to only that partner, the other partners are protected.

I thought I heard somewhere that you have protection from ordinary negligence but not gross negligence gross negligence that you have commited when it comes to limited liability entities for the practice of law, accounting, etc. But I am far from certain.

Anyway, in many states like CA professionals can't form a LLC to practice their profession in. They can form an LLP which is similar to an LLC or a professional corp.

Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said:

27 November 2007
Natalie; Yes I am. I believe you are correct. However, not to replace E&O insurance. For the cost, any protection (including slip & fall or a partner's error) is worth it.

John Huddleston http://huddlestontax.com

Dewcat113 (talk|edits) said:

2 July 2008
If an accountant showed the 99% owner of a company taking all the assets out of the company when in fact it was the 1% owner bleeding all the assets and cash. Could this come under errors and omissions or fraud by the accountant. This went on for 7 years and was discovered in a divorce situation.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

July 2, 2008
Dewcat, what is your role in this? Before answering this, I would want to know what information was given to the accountant.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/07/02/jones.penny.short.on.taxes.ktka

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

2 July 2008
Get a good malpractice attorney and sue the accountant, fraud may be a count also. Let the accountant worry how he's going to pay the judgment if found liable.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

July 2, 2008
Crow, don't you think that's a premature response? What if the accountant was told the wrong information?

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

2 July 2008
I am editing this because I don't want to start acting like Quick Draw McGraw. Dew, it really depends first on the engagement(s) contracted for. As they say in the movie biz., the "Terms of Engagement". However, there are instances where I think it's been held that failing to see the tell-tale signs of fraud may be actionable. Lot of facts we don't know. So, Natalie is correct about me jumping the gun.

If you are the party that is thinking of suing, find a good, respected civil atty, and take advice from them. Expect to have to pay for an expert witness at some point, but the lawyer may front this for you if it's a good enough case. Now, if the accountant was involved in the fraud, that's a different ball of wax. The atty. will worry about coverage issues. Finally, if you are the accountant in question, call your carrier.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

July 2, 2008
I like that response a lot better, Crow. Another possibility is that it was a mistake. I know, you're probably thinking "yeah, right." But consider this. Some staff person takes over the account and puts the wrong name down for the person taking the money. The mistake doesn't get caught. And as we know, SALY comes into play and here we are down the road with a mistake that has been perpetuated year after year.

Another question I have is where was the 99% owner when the tax returns were reviewed and signed? Were returns filed without this person's authorization?

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

2 July 2008
I agree, but keep in mind, a mistake can be negligence. So, take your facts to an experienced attorney for evaluation.

I'm curious about the 99% owner too, unless... it was the wife, and she just let hubby sign the return? Contributory negligence? Perhaps, who knows at this point.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

July 2, 2008
Good points Crow. We can guess all we want about who did what or had what information or reviewed or not reviewed returns. We just don't have enough facts once again.

RSRAGENCY (talk|edits) said:

12 February 2009
Can anyone give me a good insurance company for E/O Liability? I'm in Central NJ and for the past 16 years have had it through Norman-Spencer. Always had the max.$100/Ded./$100K per occurrence. HOWEVER, after considering most of my clients are either retired, or have less than $99K AGI, I sent in my premium for such. Sent in a check for $247.50. THIS morning I received back a fax asking for an additional $396.00!! They are telling me to continue with the maximum coverage.

They state that "even if you made a change in your practice, you need to consider continued coverage to ensure your practice in the past.

HELP!!!

DJ DJ 08:08, 12 February 2009 (CST)

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

February 12, 2009
$100 deductible? Premiums are based on revenue. Your practice must have increased from the prior year. Also, ask what the premium would be if you upped your deductible to $5,000. A hundred dollars is nothing in liability suits.

LJK CPA (talk|edits) said:

12 February 2009
DJ,

I also have coverage through Norman Spencer, so I know what you are talking about. I would give them a call. Perhaps you can agree to alter your prior years' coverage down to the new lower limits. If you can't, them you will have to make a decision. If you want to change coverage, you will probably have to pay for prior years' coverage.

Good Luck, Leslie

NMexEA (talk|edits) said:

12 February 2009
I wouldn't so much as take a phone call from a potential client without E&O insurance. Remember that, although the client/plaintiff must prove his case to collect, he needs only to feel aggrieved at you to sue. Your E&O carrier is required to represent you regardless of the merits of the claim against you and most do it on a 100% coverage basis. You do NOT EVER want to have to hire an attorney to defend you and pay for it out of your own pocket. One lousy lawsuit will pay for it, tust me.

I call it "sleep at night" insurance.

RSRAGENCY (talk|edits) said:

13 February 2009
Thanks, all. I just spoke to 'Gretchen' at Norman Spencer,,,,the whole thing is that they go by your current coverage...so if something comes up from the past, only the policy in force will apply. But, as I explained, my people don't have the mega bucks to make a big claim, so I'm keeping with the lower coverage.

DJ DJ 12:30, 13 February 2009 (CST)

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.