Discussion:Enrolled Agent Exam
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Enrolled Agent Exam
| 3 February 2006 | |
| Has anybody heard anything about the 2006 enrolled agent exam? I have looked at the IRS website and there is nothing there for 2006. | |
| 5 February 2006 | |
| Looks like they may use the electronic version by then. But it's anyone's guess. | |
| 6 February 2006 | |
| The exam is administered annually, usually in Sept or Oct. Dates are set in in Feb or March, and I believe exams are administered wherever there is an official IRS office. You may want to determine where your closest office is, then call them. | |
| 20 February 2006 | |
| apparently they will post the instructions on the irs website around April beginning of May 2006 | |
JAIDEEP929 (talk|edits) said: | 7 June 2007 |
| if anybody can guide me where to find the live courses provided by any insititute or colleges for EA Exam??
thanks | |
| 7 June 2007 | |
| Gleim has a self-study book
Here is a list of other self-study materials Scroll down to Studying for the SEE Many state EA societies hold classes NAEA State affiliates calendar I don't know of any colleges that offer this - interesting question
Good Luck - in my opinion the new Part 2 is the most difficult because of the vast amount of material it covers Kevinh5 Good luck to all studying for the test this Summer!!!! Let us know how you did! | |
| June 9, 2007 | |
| I'm in. Yes, that's shivering you see. I don't care to know what I don't know...having Riley around is enough most of the time...and yet, mandatory testing is coming, so we might as well bite the bullet and get the CPE credits to boot. NATP happens to be doing the three day in my backyard at a good time, so not much excuse not to. I know the Gleim site had links to test locations. From what I read a few months back, it's pretty much open time for testing, you do it on a computer now, not in a big room with a thousand folks. | |
| 13 July 2007 | |
| I too am preparing for this exam. I have purchased the WiseGuides and the Gleim home-study courses. I recommend both course sets. WiseGuides does an excellent job of providing full topic coverage -- but it is a bit light on the review questions. Gleim does a great job on providing plenty of questions for review and thorough explanations. Software applications from companies are excellent, but if one had to choose I would recommend the Gleim software. I would not recommend their audio CDs though. I was hoping the audio CDs would provide more thorough explanation not found in the study guides, but it does not. Someone is simply reading from their book. Can someone tell us if the new 2007 exams are asking approximately the same type of questions as found in previous years? Are the topics covered in the new exams pretty much the same focus areas? Just general guidance would be very helpful! Thanks so much and good luck to all taking the exam! | |
| 13 July 2007 | |
| The exam questions are NOT the same as those used prior exams because all of those were tossed out and new ones written from scratch. However, many of the topics are the same, so there very well could be very similar questions. You need to go to Thomson's website to see what to study per exam part.
The new questions will not be published because they will go back into the pool to draw from the same questions next year. Thomson MAY decide later to publish questions which have been retired from the pool, but don't count on it just yet. The new exam is only 1 year old. Where the old questions were written by the IRS, the new questions were all written by current EAs representing 3 organizations (National Association of Enrolled Agents, National Association of Tax Professionals, and the National Society of Accountants). The new exam was then validated in December by another panel of Subject Matter Experts - 7 EAs from the above organizations, and 2 representatives from the IRS. The new exam fairly represents the high level of knowledge in taxation and tax procedure required to be an entry-level EA. | |
| 13 July 2007 | |
| Thanks so much Kevin. I hope it did not seem that I was implying one should study "to the questions" (as opposed to using the questions to help one assess knowledge/weak areas). I firmly believe one needs to study the topics ... albeit a lot of material to cover! :-)... thanks for your feedback. | |
| 13 July 2007 | |
| You should always read the questions carefully. Many are worded "all EXCEPT" or "which is NOT" or something similar which changes the one wrong answer into the correct answer. In other words, don't rush through it if you recognize a similar question to one you have seen in your study material - the question is not the exact same as you have seen before.
As far as the focus of the questions, the exam is set up to pull questions from each topic area such that the degree of difficulty for 1 exam is the same as the degree of difficulty for another exam given that day or another day. Therefore, for example, one test taker could get 5 easy questions on one subject and 1 difficult question on a second topic; while another exam taker could get 1 difficult question on the first subject and five easy questions on the second topic. This is simplifying the process to explain it, but it gets the point across that the two exam takers may have taken equivalent exams, but they did not take the same exact exam. | |
| 13 July 2007 | |
| Thanks for taking the time to shed some light on all this. It is a bit daunting to study so intensely, daily, and not know if you're even in the ballpark. Your input has been really helpful Kevin and very much appreciated! Thanks so much .... | |
| 13 July 2007 | |
| In the interest of full disclosure, as well as fairness to all those CPAs out there reading this, passing the EA exam does not imply that you know how to prepare a tax return, any more than passing the CPA exam implies that you know how to prepare a tax return or do audits. It only represents that you have been able to memorize (and hopefully understand) what the exam writers have felt it important to know as an entry-level ____ (fill in the blank, in this case 'EA'). | |
| 6 July 2008 | |
| I completed the first part of the exam on July 05, 2008. Considering purchasing the Gleim product to study. | |
| 6 September 2008 | |
| I am considering to take the EA exam but still very confused about where I should buy the study course. In the past I bought a CPA section course from Gleim but was rather disappointed. Has anyone here joined the NAEA? And has anyone bought the SEE prep course from the NAEA? I notice the NAEA uses Gleim and wonder if anyone could let me know if it's a good idea to go this route rather than trying to do a self-study course? Thanks very much for your input. | |
Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said: | 15 November 2008 |
| I passed EA exam parts 1 and 3 on Dec 2007 and Part 2 yesterday. I used Gleim self study to pass all on first try.
Glad part II is done with.. it had me concerned...now backing to living and take care of clients. | |
Donniecastleman (talk|edits) said: | 15 November 2008 |
| Excellent Vermont! Congrats on that, and never stop learning, you'll double your knowledge just by hanging out on this forum and listening to the top dogs answer questions, I know I have. | |
| 20 November 2008 | |
| Can anybody share their experience they had while taking the test for EA?
From all the materials listed on IRS website, which ones were really mentioned or outlined? What recommendations would you have for others that are ready to take the test? Are the test different from the older versions of 2005-2004-2003 listed on IRS website? | |
| 20 November 2008 | |
| Gabila, as one of the people instrumental in helping set up the new test, let me tell you that the questions you get on the test are pulled from a pool of questions. The questions you are asked to answer will be different than the ones the person taking the exam next to you is asked. The exam will have an equivilent difficulty though. You won't be asked 100 easy questions and the other person asked 100 extremely difficult questions.
That being said (or written), ALL of the material covered on the website should be studied, as there are questions in the pool from each IRS pub and major code section. If you are not willing to study all of the material, you stand a small chance of passing, and as such, you are not deserving of the Enrolled Agent designation. The EA designation is supposed to represent to the public that you have a rounded understanding of tax and representation laws better than an unlicensed practitioner. You won't get that understanding if you don't study all of the material. The new tests pull questions from a different pool than the 03-04-05 exams. Some of the questions might be similar, but none will be the same. If you aren't scoring 80-85% on the old tests, don't schedule yourself to take the new test yet until you do. | |
| 20 November 2008 | |
| I passed all three Parts in the 2008-2009 cycle. I don't know how well I did, they don't tell you anymore, but on Parts 1 and 2 I said (explicative deleted) out loud in the exam room when the "congratulations" letter appeared on the screen. I was quite sure that I'd failed, you see.
I'm not given to foul language, either, so you can use that as an indicator of the intensity of my surprise and relief. So FWIW, here are a few observations: -Actually work the computation problems, ALL of the computation problems, when you study. Don't allow yourself to assume you understand how to arrive at the correct answer. You will get questions that look a lot like the practice questions but the numbers will be different and several computations will be combined in one question. You WILL be expected to know that year's numbers, too. -Understand each computational process. IRS uses some odd step-by-step ways to arrive at, say, the amount of a Social Security benefit that is taxable. When studying, try to visualize the effect of their math model. That will help you remember how to do the computation. It helped me to write out the steps as simple equations. -In Part 3, don't just study the questions, download a current copy of Circular 230 and read it through with a highlighter in hand. They care about that stuff and they want you to know it in detail. Also know the types, anmounts, and bases for the various civil penalties. -Finally, download the exam syllabus from the Thomson website and go through the list of topics for whichever Part you will be taking. If anything on that list is unfamiliar, STOP. Find out about it before you proceed. The pass rate overall on Part 1 is actually fairly dismal at something like 57%, including both first timers and retakes. The pass rates on Parts 2 and 3 are much higher, in the mid 70s, so once you're through Part 1, it's a breeze, right? Well, no...I personally think that the higher pass rates on Parts 2 and 3 are the result of self selection. Most people attempt Part 1 first and don't try the others until they pass. Part 2 was by far the hardest for me. The exam is straightforward but I found it challenging. Good luck to all! | |
| 20 November 2008 | |
| Hi Kevin and NM, thanks for your words. It's always interesting to hear about how the tests are made and the experience of people who have tried them.
I passed all three parts on the first try. I have been studying harder for the SEE than for anything else in my entire life. I didn't know anything about the American Tax Code but luckily I had the experience of preparing and making more than 200 rather complex tax returns for the 2007 tax season. That's definitely what saved me (and of course my total stubborness). I think the tests might be a lot easier if you have worked several years as a tax preparer. It's A LOT easier to remember the form numbers if you have actually used them in your work. NM, it's funny how you say that you thought that you had failed after the first two tests, I thought the same after test one (and yes I stayed for the entire almost 4 hours). Test 2 was pretty easy (because of serious studying) and test 3 was ok too. I am now (impatiently) waiting for the license. I really enjoy doing this kind of work and now I am just learning more every single day. This site is brilliant for that (and with Crow & co. you'll have a great laugh as well). My study material was from Thomas Tax Seminar but I do NOT recommend them (they sent the final study material almost 6 months AFTER I paid them). I have heard lots of good things about Gleim. We need more professional tax preparers out there (who actually know what they are doing) and I wish you good luck! | |
| 27 November 2008 | |
| Hi guys,
Thanks for your answers. I was just curious to read the exams experiences from people that actually took them. I'm not a native american. I'm romanian. After studying a part of the IRS publications I have to say that the hardest part so far is to understand the US legislation...or knowing the US legislation or the US economy rules or terms. Especially the ones regarding banks, stocks, dividents etc. Do you think it's a good idea just to study the materials from the IRS website or should I get help from Gleim or Thomas? Also, do you have any other recommendations about any another materials I should study for a better understanding of the IRS materials and the economic situations described ? I wanna take the test because in Romania I work for an exchange students program agency through which we send romanian students to work in US for the summer and I would like to offer them a service for their federal refunds from IRS. Many thanks. | |
| 27 November 2008 | |
| I strongly suggest that you take the Gleim course, or Thomas - it's really a matter of personal preference. Most, not all, of the respondents on this board prefer Gleim.
By taking a course, it provides you with explanations to the test question answers that the IRS publications don't. Also, at the present time, NAEA offers on online course using the Gleim publications and materials. You can contact NAEA at www.naea.org | |


