Discussion:EA Exam

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> EA Exam

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Now the fun really begins. I've started to study and pre-test for the EA Exam. I'm using the Gleim Study guides. I haven't scheduled the exam yet. I figure late summer or mid fall. I want to allow myself the time to study and learn.

I'll use this study time to reflect and find my 'inner tax practitioner'.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Good luck!

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Thanks D&T. I've been wanting to take this exam for a while now. It's a personal goal to me. It's another rung on the ladder.

Unlike CPA, most people (clients) don't know what EA stands for. Enrolled is easy, but once you utter the word Agent people tend to couple it with IRS and the room gets very quiet. You can see the wheel turning in their heads as they think you are and IRS Agent...and they just mentioned 'off the books'.

With any luck, a few of my problem clients will either be scared straight or take a hike.

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
It's been so long since I studied (and I never really studied then) that it will be hard for me to get into the swing of it. I also am planning on sitting for the EA. I'm going to take a few classes this summer and begin studying with the goal of taking the test next summer.

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Although I've just started my study routine, I find that the Gleim study guide is very helpful. Just based on the short period that I've been using it, I would recommend it.

I spent $270 for the books and test cd (3 parts). I opted out of the online option...it's the same as the CD minus the online counselor.

Actionbsns (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Rg, your mention of the IRS and Agent, reminds me of a story. I had just finished my exams and had been awarded the EA when we met some family members and their friends in Las Vegas. We were all sitting around having dinner at a restaurant when one of the friends started talking about retiring and selling his store. He was full of bravado and himself and was making comments that would make any IRS agent just itch to get in and take a bette look. In a lull in his verbocity, my husband said to him "Paula's an enrolled agent with the IRS." You never saw someone go redder, and become more quiet so fast in your life. There was a very pregnant pause at the table and then the noisy guy blustered that "IRS agents ought to be required to let people know they are present!!!" He didn't have much more to say on the topic the rest of the evening.

Good luck with your studying and with the test.

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Now that's funny!!

Cttax (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
I took the EA tests last November & passed all 3. I used the Gleim CD's & books also. Mostly they were very good. I found that business study guides were right in sync with the tests but that the personal were quite as good. . I remember on the personal test there were several questions about insurance trusts that I did not have a clue. Just an FYI & good luck.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 April 2007
Go to the Thomson Prometric website, register, and download the recommended reading/study list. Read EVERY pub listed in addition to taking a class (or self-study book).

The new test does not rely on the old test - all of the questions are new, though some may be similar. The old questions were written by IRS employees. The new questions were written by practicing EAs who want you to have a certain level of competency before admitting you to the tax expert "club".

MIG999 (talk|edits) said:

30 April 2007
I took the exams in November and passed all 3. I found the NATP course to be quite helpful. I did not find the test terrible difficult.

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2007
I'm finding that the study guides are working quite well. I seem to make stupid mistakes on items that I know and misread the question or read too much into the question. The answer review is really helps in strengthening my knowledge on why I got it right, and pointing to my erred ways when I don't.

All in all it's staring to get fun (isn't that sick?). Well, it's back to books

- Rick

Sandysea (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2007
Yes RICK...you are definitely SICK. Do you also read the Master Tax Guide for fun? hehehehe

Hellothere (talk|edits) said:

2 May 2007
I passed the exam by using the materials from the Phoenix Tax Group. The study cards were very helpful since I was able to carry them around with me and study whenever I had a minute.

Good luck with your studies!!!

Sarami (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
Has anyone recently purchased WiseGuides?

I found that the 3rd part contains comparatively less questions than the other two. The 3rd part has just 186 questions in total, when the second part has over 400 (not the book it self, but the software). Does it mean that the third part is not that difficult? (I wish!)Or if my version contains an error? I past the first and second parts recently, which were not that bad. I think that the WiseGuide helped a lot. I am taking the third part next week, and I feel completely lost since I don't have any experience in this area.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
The third section covers less material for sure. If you passed parts one and two, you should have no problem passing part three. You also might want to broaden your reading with Pub 594 and Pub 556.

The trickiest part for me was figuring out all the SOLs for refunds.

Donniecastleman (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
I had really good luck with Lambers EA review by Arthur Reed, passed all 4 parts the first time (isn't it three parts now?) so it may be worth checking out if you have the time, anyway I have to give credit where credit is due. Good luck with the exam, I should have done the EA thing years ago instead of waiting until 2005.

Kathyt (talk|edits) said:

16 November 2007
I used WiseGuides & passed all 4 parts with flying colors the first time. But that was before they changed the test.

Sarami (talk|edits) said:

25 November 2007
Passed the last part!

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

25 November 2007
Congrats Sarami!

Inagpurwala (talk|edits) said:

26 November 2007
Passed 1st and 3rd part in one try. I will try 2nd part second time next month (December 2007).Inagpurwala 17:37, 26 November 2007 (CST)

Threefeet (talk|edits) said:

28 November 2007
I had good luck with NATP online course. I took the exam last summer and passed all four parts. (I was really surprised!) Good luck because your brain will hurt until after you take the exam!

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
Taking the EA exam (individuals) next week.. any words of wisdom on overly weighted areas to prepare for? I am using the Gleim program to prepare.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
That section should be the easiest of the three assuming that you have done 1040 tax returns including schedules A, B, C, and D. I would think that you would want to know about alimony recapture, wash sales, filing status, refundable and non-refundable credits, AMT, SE tax and the computation for SE HI and retirement plans for the SE'ed. Probably stuff that you have already seen in real life.

EA Subject Matter Experts are currently writing some new questions as Prometric will rotate the question pool.


DO let us know when you pass all 3 parts and PLEASE give us feedback in comparison with the CPA exam that you have passed.

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
Passed both. CPA exam is significantly hardly in that it covers a broader range of items for testing.

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
"significantly hardly" - let's try "significantly harder" :)

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
You should not say that, Think Tax! Kevin is back to defend the honor of us (we?)(them?) EAs. Image:smile.jpg

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
No, I wanted an honest opinion.

If the EA exam is so easy, I would think that a CPA could challenge it without having to study. If the CPA exam were easy, there would be a lot more CPAs. Both are difficult.

I wanted an opinion of "here's how they are different" and "here's how they were the same".

Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
Is there value in having both?

John Huddleston Seattle Bellevue Tax Accountant

GeoEA1065 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
I have taken and passed both (except Auditing which I am retaking tomorrow). If we are talking about the whole exam than the CPA is harder hands down. Mainly because it covers a much larger amount of material: economics, IT, Cost Accounting, GAAP etc etc....if we mean on tax than the EA had more diffecult tax questions than did the CPA regulation section. Tax is just 60% of one section of a four section test. CPA exam is a mile wide and an inch deep. The EA was only a quarter mile wide but a lot deeper.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
So if you are taking the CPA exam you had better be prepared for a long walk, but if you are taking the EA exam you had better know how to swim?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

29 November 2007
I only wish I had copies of the questions for the years I passed the EA Exam; I think it was 1983 and 1994 but am not sure. I'd be curious to see what was included then and now.

Wonderful analogy, Kevin!!!

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

30 November 2007
Neither exam is "easy." The EA exam certainly drills deeper into the tax arena than does the CPA exam. The CPA exam, of course, deals with areas in which a tax accountant does not practice (nor cares to practice), e.g., auditing & fiancial reporting. I was a tax manager at a CPA firm as an EA long before I was a CPA (which is recently). The only reason I even took the CPA exam was for marketability.

Interestingly, from the recent stats I've read, the section of the CPA exam that has the lowest pass rate is REG (Regulations) which contains federal taxation.

I always stay away from the we/them controversy. To me, it boils down to the person and not the credentials. I know CPAs and EAs who are absolutely brilliant. I also know CPAs and EAs that, for the life of me, I don't know how they could even pass a driving test.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

8 December 2007
passed individuals yesterday.. 3 1/2 hours is a ton of time to complete this!.. i was out in under 2 hrs.. taking part 3 the end of the month...

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

8 December 2007
Way back in the mid eighties during trainging at PW (Pre PWC) we discussed the ranking of importance in skills, they called it GAAP, GAAS, TAX.

GAAP was rated number one and the logic is you can't apply tax or audit work to a transaction you don't understand. A capital lease is a perfect example. You can syudy it all dau long but simply miss it when preparing a tax return. Thus whether you are a CPA or EA is arguably secondary to your ability to understand business transactions and people.

Not sure what's on the EA exam but I agree with Thinktax, I have met many awesome tax pro's both CPA's and EA's and many knuckleheads who were CPA's and EA's.

Think about this theory, if you are on TA a few times a week, you are at a minimum curious abot your profession. More than likely you enjoy the profession. That is what helps build skill. I have had several CPA's work for me that were not intuitively curious, received all their training from mandated CPE and their compensation showed it.

Gmikeg (talk|edits) said:

9 December 2007
Nice work Vermontcpa! Had the pleasure of taking the last written test in 2005 in Albuquerque, NM. Just one question that I have for all CPAs that later get their EA: Why? I'm not doubting your desire to expand your horizons, but did you learn a lot of new stuff studying for the EA exam. (I'm not a CPA, just EA)

Also in response to SouthParkcpa; I've been an EA since April '06, and love the challenges of the profession. Met many EAs that don't know jack about tax law, and a few CPAs where I needed to fix there work. I know basic accounting (took I and II), but I don't know jack about GAAP. Do you think I could get a lot out of it? Let me know...

Thanks,

Mike G.,EA

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

9 December 2007
Mike

Not sure why a CPA would take the EA but it's like good soup, Can never hurt! That said........

My practice and focuses on businesses and their owners with sales between 1 mil and 10 mil. As such, whether I like it or not I am confronted with consolidations, mergers, sales, new partners, LP's strange bank financing etc... My favorite saying is that 70 percent of what I do can be done by a 2nd year guy. The other 30 percent is the tough part. Meaning, as you grow, you will be confronted with issues you can't avoid. The last 3 years in my practice have been spent ridding ourselves of work we shouldn't do (small 1040's and corps, write up, local tax work etc...).

In my experience, the 3 classes I highly recommend is Intermediate I and II for the more in depth review of

the BS and P and L  and Business law I.  Contract and employment law are key in my view to good tax work. This is just one opinion. 

By the way, I am originally from Long Island as well. My masters is from CW Post.

Matt

Gmikeg (talk|edits) said:

9 December 2007
My cousin got her accounting degree from CW Post (small world). Nice friggin school!

I got Bus Law I already, great course! My Intermediate Accounting book is sitting on the shelf. I might just sit down and crack it open...

By the way; what's BS and P and L?

Thanks,

Mike

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

11 December 2007
Sorry,

Balance sheet and Profit and loss

Not sure what you mean by nice friggin school. Sarcasm? Post is OK, not great..............

Matt

Boomerblau (talk|edits) said:

11 December 2007
I got my EA first in 2003 and now I've passed all 4 parts of the CPA and jumping through a few final posts.

The sentiment above is really great concerning the depth and bredth of the two exams. A mile wide and an inch deep vs. a quarter mile wide and four feet deep. I'll have to borrow that.

I truly only need the EA, but the public recognition regarding the CPA "brand" will further my practice - and my fees. I look forward to the day where both are equally respected by the public for the two separate functions (assurance vs. representation) that they serve.

Aaron

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

29 December 2007
I'm considering taking the EA exam and was wondering if anyone has used the study kits available at the IRS.gov website and their practice questions to prepare for the exam? Here's the link:

http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/agents/article/0,,id=109302,00.html

Some of the classes/guides/CD/Online help seem a little cost prohibitive. Not sure if appropriate but can one acquire some these study guides second hand? Thanks all!

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

29 December 2007
I would recommend the Gleim Study Guide. I used it and it worked well. My downside was that I took my time studying and missed my test window. There's always next year.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

31 December 2007
Thanks for the tip, Rgtaxservice, good luck on the test - I thought the new automated test is open until 02/28/2008 and then opens again on 05/01/2008? Maybe I am wrong but I think it's in this link somewhere:

http://www.prometric.com/NR/rdonlyres/eajqgs36mjpozcwifkywhkke7iuekusbuncejvfhis75itq3d46jzhzilg2ov7u5nznnwki2rw5rf5jgg6jopl7nlhb/IRSCIB20071126.pdf

I found this a heplful link with lots of info. Again, good luck!

Shaunna (talk|edits) said:

31 December 2007
I took the test two years ago and missed passing all parts by missing 7points in what was then section 3. Since then they have actually made the test easier by allowing the test to be taken one part at a time. However, they also made my life difficult by merging previous sections 2 & 3 together to form just part 2 which is ALL business questions from Sch C to S-Corp to Partnership to Fiduciary all in the same section. The also don't tell you what you missed or what you didn't miss anymore (unless they changed that).

I will say that having to restudy for those two sections was a pain but I did find the part two a lot easier! I became official this year!

Unfortunately, for me, what I discovered is that not having my CPA is causing me to lose clients that I could otherwise have. So, now I have a goal to get back to school and get it done.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
I passed parts 1 individual and 3 procedures in December 2007.. taking 2 business in Feb.

Gleim study is the way to go and is what I have used. Books and CD with test questions only.. all else seems not necessary.

Keep in mind I do have two full seasons of tax work going into these exams.. also a CPA.

Uncle Sam (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Vermont-you're in the same position as my wife. She's got Parts 1 and 3 done, now Part 2.

And she's using Gleim. Gleim got her through the other 2 parts.

Shaunna (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Vermount - why if you have your CPA are you taking the exam? You can already represent clients before the IRS.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Were the study questions provided by Gleim very helpful or just a little helpful. I know the exam questions are now being written by EA's and this only started in May 2007. Has Gleim been able to accomodate for this? Thanks for the responses and tips, they help.

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
Gleim study questions/guides were very helpful. For me the key was constantly testing and reviewing.

EAinCA (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2008
I just passed part 1 of the EA, but in addition to the Gleim review, I took a seminar by Bob Arthur that I found very helpful. The website is www.eareview.com and they have seminars in the Summer/Fall, although I do not think the 2008 dates are posted yet.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

3 January 2008
I wanted to do something with downtime during tax season and I decided on this endeavor. It has served as a good refresher for me as well as getting into the details of certain areas my practice has not encountered. Eventually I will be have both credentials which can't hurt.

I found certain questions on EA exam where not even covered by Gleim.. Overall you are getting enough of the exam topics to be able to pass. I still would recommend Gleim.. I have done all the online updates so don't give me that tip.

Vermontcpa (talk|edits) said:

3 January 2008
that should read downtime during NON tax season...

Uncle Sam (talk|edits) said:

4 January 2008
The question was raised - if you're a CPA, why get the EA?

Well - the answer is simple. If you anything at all about this country's accountancy laws, you'd know that the CPA credential is a STATE license. The EA is a FEDERAL license. Not every state has reciprocity with respect to recognizing another state's CPA license - whereas the EA is recognized all over the country.

So - if at some point in the future you wish to move to another state and still wish to have gainful employment without having to go through the licensing procedure a second time, the EA license provides you that mobility.

Shaunna (talk|edits) said:

5 January 2008
Well, Uncle Sam - your name is quite appropriate with the comment:) That is a point that I had not thought about. thanks!!

Lmcdon9822 (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
Hi all

Coming from an engineering/programming background (B.S. in Electrical Engineering and M.S. in Infromation Systems) I cannot take the CPA exam based on the educational requirements. I don't have enough credits or non at all in accounting, business or taxation at the college level. I have been preparing income taxes for 10+ years and will be taking the EA exam later this year.

As most folks said in the post, CPA name recognition is key for higher fees. The setback is if you move to a different state you may need to sit for the exam again.

ThinkTax (talk|edits) said:

13 January 2008
Lmcdon9822: The setback is if you move to a different state you may need to sit for the exam again.

That's not really the case. Most states, if not all, have reciprocity rules.

Micmac (talk|edits) said:

23 June 2008
Has anyone taken the exam recently? I am taking part 1 next week.

EAinCA (talk|edits) said:

6 July 2008
Micmac - I just took part 3 on July 3rd and passed (just waiting on the form 23 approval). Good luck on part 1, have you taken the other parts yet?

DianeM (talk|edits) said:

29 July 2008
Looking for study aids for EA test. Lots of people reference Gleim, but their prices are up there. Also looked at Exam Matrix. Seems that Exam Matrix is mostly online with little printed to study from. Call me old fashioned, but I like to use a book -- not outlines -- a textbook. Just went to Wiseguides website and see that prices are MUCH more reasonable. They have books and software. Someone told me that their materials have changed quite a bit in the last year. More in their text books, more questions and answers and they also have flashcards (electronic on a CD). Asked around to see if others liked using Wiseguides and got good comments. Definitely worth checking out. - DM

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums