Discussion:Delinquent tax client (2006 and 2007)
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Delinquent tax client (2006 and 2007)
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Delinquent tax client (2006 and 2007)
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 23 February 2009 |
| Hi all,
2) I will have him go to the local IRS office and have the first page of his 1040 stamped as received for comfort before filing (I am not able to do this since I am not an EA or CPA). 3) If it turns out that he owes taxes for 2006 and/or 2007, he will receive a notice of tax due/demand for payment from the IRS once the returns are filed. 4) If it turns out he doesn't owe taxes for 2006 or 2007, no penalties or interest will apply. 5) Assuming he owes taxes and cannot pay those taxes, I will have him pay what he can and then visit the local IRS office and have him seek an installment agreement. 6) Since there has been no contact from the IRS, I will file them using the standard address for the return year.
Now for my questions....
Michael | |
| 23 February 2009 | |
| File them all at once. I see no reason to walk them in to an IRS office since he is not under any IRS deadline or under levy. If you want comfort, send them certified and mail them yourself. No reason to subject the client to the ordeal of a walkin to the IRS. Just make sure they are mailed in separate envelopes. You may want to call the Practitioner Hotline first to see if any other returns need filing or if any Substitutes for Return have been prepared. You can also order any 1099's or W-2's that may have been filed. | |
| 23 February 2009 | |
| If his income is as low as you say, is it possible he's not even required to file? If that's the case, you might save him money by not preparing the returns and just charging him for consulting to verify he's not required to file. If, for example, you're going to charge him $800 so he can collect a $400 refund and he's not required to file, maybe not filing is a better option. | |
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 23 February 2009 |
| Irsfixer,
Thank you for the clarification, I knew about the separate envelopes but failed to include that in my OP.
Michael | |
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 23 February 2009 |
| AEM,
| |
| 23 February 2009 | |
| BTW, we do not file them certified unless a statute is an issue. Never had a problem. I do highly recommend a call to the Hotline. | |
| 23 February 2009 | |
| If net self-employment income exceeds $400 - a return is required. | |
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 23 February 2009 |
| Irsfixer,
Michael | |
| 23 February 2009 | |
| If you file one then wait - assuming he owes on both, it will get the two in different collection cycles. Better to have them in the same collection status. | |
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 23 February 2009 |
| Good point, thanks Irsfixer. | |
| 23 February 2009 | |
| Brock, remember, if he has over $400 of SE income he is required to file, even if he has no taxable income. | |
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 17 March 2009 |
| The client is back...I thought I lost him but he is back. This is actually good because it gets me in the game. I am actually out of clients....all my clients lined up early this year so my tank is empty.
Michael | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| I would never advise a client to not pay the tax with the return unless he couldn't pay it, and even then he should pay as much as he can. If he has the money, pay the tax and then let IRS calculate the P&I. | |
| March 17, 2009 | |
| "go ahead and pay that amount when he files so that he can at least avoid a 2008 failure to file penalty."
Did you mean failure to pay penalty? If he files by April 15th, there would be no failure to file penalty. Wow! $800 for three returns with simple Sch Cs? If I charged that much (in my area, anyway), I'd have no clients! I charge around $120 for a self-employed contractor, with a simple Sch C and nothing else. Takes about 10 minutes, so I'm happy. | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| IrsFixer,
You posted that you would mail all of the returns in seperate envelopes. Could you explain why? I have never had a problem with mailing them together. What do you know that I dont know? | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| You are very lucky then. If you mail more than one tax return to the Service Center, there is a better than even chance that they will staple them all together and process the one on top. There will be no record of the others being received. This information comes from the Director of the Austin Service Center.
This is not an issue if you are mailing them to a Revenue Officer, Revenue Agent or ACS Tech. who is expecting them. | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| Probably a lot. No slight to you, but I'd take 1-10 odds on him any day. | |
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 17 March 2009 |
| Deback....typo, brain fart, whatever we attribute it to....I actually meant to type failure to PAY not failure to file.
Michael | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| Pay the oldest tax first. Send money with the tax return. If you can't afford it, send what you can and the IRS will bill you with the interest and penalties.
If you send in an earlier tax return that owes taxes and then send in the current one with the payment, the IRS can still reclassify it. You are better off paying the older taxes first and then if you have to you can set up a payment plan for the current year. | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| At the risk of redundancy, mailing the returns separately makes sure they get processed separately.
If there is a refund due on an "older" year and a balance due on a more recent one, I recommend mailing the old year a few weeks before the recent one and elect to have the refund applied as an estimated tax payment to the recent year. This will result in the credit being posted as of the due date of the return and reducing the amount on the recent return subject to late filing penalty and estimated tax penalty. | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| Michael - Your fee sounds reasonable in this neck of the woods, or perhaps on the low side.
Most preparers have a policy of requiring advance payment of their fee in the case of nonfilers - which has been discussed on this forum. (i.e. if they're not afraid to stiff the IRS, they're sure not afraid to stiff the preparer.) Irsfixer knows way more about this than I, but my first impulse would be, as you suggest, to pay the 2008 liability with the filing of the 2008 return, but wait for the IRS to bill the client for 2006 and 2007 amounts due. The down side of this would be that he might owe a month or two more in late payment penalties and interest, but at least he would have a handle on the entire amount owed, plus might be able to enter into an installment plan for both years combined. | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| You can make a payment on a newer tax first if you designate the payment. This assumes you are not in an installment agreement already though. It may be to your advantage to pay newer taxes first if the penalties have exhausted themselves on the older taxes but are active on the newer ones. | |
| 17 March 2009 | |
| If he can't pay, then to pay the new taxes first will avoid failure to pay penalties that can be up to 25% and which will already have maxed out on the prior year balances. | |
Brock And Associates (talk|edits) said: | 17 March 2009 |
| Thanks all....
| |


