Discussion:Capitalize expenses?
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Capitalize expenses?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Capitalize expenses?
| 25 September 2009 | |
| My client (single member LLC filing a schedule C) is in the business of land development. In 2008 we kept track of his expenses related to the research and costs involved with purchase of a large piece of land. Finally, at the end of 2008, the LLC purchased 100% of the stock of the s-corporation that owned the land. (The s-corporation's only asset was the land). So right now, I have an LLC with around $100,000 of expenses related to this project that I am unsure what to do with. Do I expense them as research expenses or do I somehow capitalize them to land owned by the S-corp? | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| my first thought is the $100k would be outside basis related to the acquisition of the S-corp and therefore not deducted until the shares of the s-corp are sold or liquidated. Because the land is held in an existing S-Corp I don't see the 100k being added to the land basis itself or even to to balance sheet of the s-corp due to the timing of the payments.
Jack | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| I think I read your post clearly but I am not sure whether the S corp purchased the land in 2008 and later the LLC purchased stock in S corp in 2008? In any case the S Corp has a capital assets on its books, the LAND. Expenses that were incurred in connection with land purchase are added to the basis. Since land can’t be depreciated, you have 0 income/loss (assuming no other expenses), thus LLC can’t do anything and wait until the S Corp sells the land and realized cap gains. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Assuming purchase price = land value and land value decreased since purchased. Have S Corp distribute land to shareholder triggering gain/loss and establishing new basis within the LLC. This puts the land in an organization better to set up to hold real estate and/or develop. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| PS: Your research and costs involved in purchase of land sounds like acquistion costs. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Your disregarded entity(LLC) is simply a stockholder and whatever costs were incurred are most likely all outside basis in the S Corp stock. Can't get it on the books of the S Corp without a 338 election and even then wouldn't be worth it unless the land will be treated as inventory and possibly subdivided for sale and you want this basis to be part of the gain/loss calcs. Keeping it as outside basis only affects your shareholder basis worksheets.
See my other recent discussion thread about deducting the interest and/or any loan costs for any debt your stockholder incurred to purchase that S Corp interest. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| And I agree an LLC is much better entity to hold real estate. Corporate entities are problematic for holding real property. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| The land will be subdivided and treated as inventory available for sale so possibly a 338 election would be best. The s-corp will have the built-in gains tax to also deal with as the land was previously held in a c-corp so my guess is that I can't distributing the land to an LLC will trigger the built in gains tax now instead of taking upon each sale. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Also - be careful of structuring a sale of the land to get it out of the S Corp. You would have either a non deductible related party sale loss (becomes a basis adjustment) or a taxable event where you pay tax simply to increase your basis and change who owns it.
Another thought that occurred to me is what happens to your $100K+ outside basis in the S Corp if the S Corp sells the land. Would the S Corp then be dissolved? After distributing the cash back out, you could be left with a capital loss on cratering the S Corp stock. Capital losses have severe deduction limits. No 1244 loss can be taken since your TP was not the original stockholder in the S Corp. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Also - be careful of structuring a sale of the land to get it out of the S Corp. You would have either a non deductible related party sale loss (becomes a basis adjustment) or a taxable event where you pay tax simply to increase your basis and change who owns it.
Another thought that occurred to me is what happens to your $100K+ outside basis in the S Corp if the S Corp sells the land. Would the S Corp then be dissolved? After distributing the cash back out, you could be left with a capital loss on cratering the S Corp stock. Capital losses have severe deduction limits. No 1244 loss can be taken since your TP was not the original stockholder in the S Corp. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| KathiJud - won't the 338 election trigger the built in gains tax immediately? | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Without actual number to calculate and assuming no significant appreciation in land since purchase (late 2008) and land in S Corp equals FMV paid for S Corp, you would be better off distributing land to LLC at FMV (Gain flows thru to LLC on Schedule D). Closeout S Corp making stock worthless and creating captial loss. Capital gains and losses net on Schedule D. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| I'm thinking it is best to treat these partly as investigative costs (deductible as a current expense on schedule C) and then the actual aquisition costs will be capitalized and not recovered until the business is sold. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Don't worry about related party sales if the only asset in S Corp is the land. The FMV transaction of the stock price in purchase of the S Corp will support the value. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Larry0434, I need to find out actual number. However, I am pretty sure it is significant. Land has been transferred down through the generations. The purchase price of the land was $2,400,000. Assume the land has basis in S-corp of $300,000. Let's say at the time it was converted to S-corp is has a FMV of $2,400,000. I am pretty sure the difference in basis and FMV is fairly large as my clients (who have another tax attorney that helped them through the purchase of this) have been very concerned about the minimum gains tax. So assuming the significant appreciation...what would your recommmend? I did read your other posts regarding rev proc 92-029...which is something I will look into further considering the expected length of this project. Right not though, I am trying to complete their schedule C and trying to figure out what to do with all the investigative costs of determining whether they would buy the corp. They had significant travel expenses, professional fees (engineers, legal, etc.), and other costs in just determining the feasibility of the investment. Then there were the actual costs of buying the stock which was acquired through financing - thus loan fees which I would assume would be considered acquisition costs. | |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 25 September 2009 |
| "The purchase price of the land was $2,400,000." Or do you mean that the purchase price of the stock of the S corporation was $2,400,000? Was the stock bought at a discount, i.e., below the value of the land, because of the built-in gain tax? | |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 25 September 2009 |
| The LLC is in the business of land development and likely will pay ordinary income tax when/if the existing gains are recognized by the LLC/developer upon/after/in the course of subdividing and building and selling whatever he turns this raw land into. If there's a way legitimately to trigger a capital gain in the S corporation today, I say we should be thinking about that as a first priority. Like maybe there's several hundred thousand dollars of income tax difference. But then the built-in gain pops up and .. and ...
Good problem to have! | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| I don't quite have all the facts on the purchase (I don't know that I need them at this point-but if so I can get them). I know they have two appraisals, but I didn't ask for the amount. I would assume that the FMV of the land is likely more than $2,400,000 to take into consideration the minimum gains tax as yes they did buy the S-corp for $2,400,000. | |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 25 September 2009 |
| When you say minimum gains do you mean the AMT or the BIG? | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Oh my you didn't previously mention the C Corp status in earlier years and the BIG problem. Yes the 338 triggers that but it would have been an expense to the folks who sold the stock to your TP. Of course they would have not been happy about that and this would have affected the sale price they would want. Prior owners taxed on all income/gains as of final date of their ownership which includes deemed sale of assets and the BIG tax. Next day books re-open with your new owner and set up his capital accounts and stepped up basis in assets to proceed. Both old and new stockholders must consent. That is the "cliff notes" version of a 338. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Thanks KathiJud. We will not be doing a 338 election. I believe the price was adjusted downward to compensate for the taxes that will be paid upon each sale of the land that is being subdivided.
One more question. I am trying to determine how the interest expense on the loan acquired to buy the stock should be treated. The loan was taken out in the name of LLC. According to the instructions for 4952, investment interest expense is interest paid or accrued on a loan that is allocable to property held for investment. Property held for investment is property that produces income not derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Since the whole business of both the LLC and the S-corp (now owned by the LLC) is to buy, develop and sale the land, would this exclude this from being investment interest? It is confusing because if you think of it from the standpoint of a sole proprietor or invividual purchasing stock in a company as an investment (on which they borrow money to do so), it is clearly investment interest expense. In my clients case, it is not as straight-forward. Yes, the loan interest, is specifically to purchase the stock, however if they would have done as asset purchase instead they would have capitalized the interest to the cost of the project. | |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 25 September 2009 |
| Don't miss the concurrently running thread in this forum about where and how and under what circumstances the interest paid on debt incurred to purchase the stock of an S corporation may be deducted. | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Thank you Harry! I already directed him to that thread in an earlier post. Lrussell the interest flows to Sch E page 2 and not to investment interest.
On the question of filing a Schedule C - NOTHING will ever hit a schedule C for this LLC. The LLC is a disregarded entity that simply made a stock purchase. You have to think of all this as being done by the individual and not an entity which not does exist for tax pruposes. This cannot be a trade or business activity. No write off of organization expenses either. 100% outside basis in the stock for everything paid out leading up to the sale plus the sale price & any closing costs. Separate treatment of loan costs if the stock purchase was financed. This is also discussed in the other thread started by me recently. Kathi | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 25 September 2009 |
| This One? Discussion: Amortize loan costs when acquire existing S Corp? | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Thanks everyone for your help!
KathiJud - agree that the LLC is a disregarded entity however it has been in business for many years developing land. So on the LLC's books, I was adding an Other Asset "Investment in S-Corp". I realize that the K-1 from the S-corp will go directly to Schedule E and now the interest also on page 2 of sch E. My Quickfinder book indicates that "Costs of investigating business possibilities, such as market analysis, facilities,...etc.", are generally deducted (1) if incurred by an existing business (which the LLC is) in the process of normal expansion, the costs are deducted as current expenses. Once the decision has been made to acquire a specific business, subsequent acquisition costs must be capitalized and are not recovered until the business is sold (outside basis). With this said, just want to make sure you agree and that I am not off my rocker with my thinking! Also, I do have the same issue with you with regards to the loan fees to purchase the investment. I plan to amortize the loan related fees over the loan term as amortization expense on schedule C. This of course contradicts what you said above...where would you include them? Thanks, Laura | |
| 25 September 2009 | |
| Hi Laura
I didn't realize the LLC had an existing land development business instead of being recently formed simply to make the S Corp stock purchase. However, the same thinking would apply. You cannot merge these two activities together on the Schedule C. Ignore the LLC entity and you see one TP with a business activity plus that TP has ownership of a separate S Corp. Doesn't look to me like you expanded the business activity since TP didn't purchase an asset outright and bring it into the existing business. TP acquired a separate established business as a stockholder and all but loan costs are capitalized as outside basis. On the LLC books, everything related to the acquisition posts to its Investment in S Corp account. I suppose there could be some justification for investigation expenses if the TP was first looking at simply buying the land and adding to the LLC's operations. When that plan changed however and the TP began to negotiate to buy the stock the character of the expenses changes. My other thread addresses amortization of the loan costs to buy the S Corp stock on Sch E page 2 just like the interest charges on the loan. I do not believe it would be proper to put them on the Sch C. Owning stock is not a trade or business activity. Kathi | |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 26 September 2009 |
| *Maybe* treating the interest paid on the loan taken to buy the stock of the S corporation could be treated as *investment* interest and would help taxpayer's argument that the land in the S corporation *isn't* held in a trade or business, not yet at least, while he looks around to find out if he can manage a transaction that pays capital gain on the land and makes out better that way in spite of the BIG tax. Read very carefully the logic of | |
| 26 September 2009 | |
| Good point Harry. The post by Laura stated her TP's intention was to develop this land (active trade or business use) and apparently had to buy the stock in the S Corp to do that. I'm sure the prior owners were advised to do that and avoid the BIG tax. | |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 27 September 2009 |
| Just a point: the NUBIG isn't necessarily as large as the unrealized gain on the land today. The NUBIG should have been carefully documented as of the date the C corporation became the S corporation, and it might be much smaller than *today's* taxable appreciation in the land.
Oh, the seller of the corporate stock *did* provide the purchaser with some sort of *proof* of the value of the land at the date of the conversion to S corporation, didn't they...? Oh, oops, maybe they didn't or couldn't. And wouldn't that be a mess. The kind of thing that would have reduced the bargained-for purchase price of the S corporation stock by tens of thousands of dollars... | |
| 27 September 2009 | |
| The NUBIG gain has to be the increased value for no more than 10 prior years. 10 years after conversion BIG tax no longer applies. With current real estate market declines it might not be such a big bad deal...
I just went through something similar in trying to get documentation of FMV's at date of conversion on a multi million dollar deal with a lot of real property owned for many years. The S Corp was converted 8 years earlier so two years to go. Large accounting firm that had served this company for many years told me no appraisals or workpapers had been done so not available. Also told me no workpapers done to track the C Corp E&P which appeared to be over ten million looking at the small number for AAA versus large amount of retained earnings. Not very firm ground for me to be able to start off with. GRRRRR | |
Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said: | 27 September 2009 |
| I would've thought that the currently falling real estate market would make the BIG tax problem worse, compared to the income tax on the gain. Like, the NUBIG is sorta fixed, and the the regular taxable gain is coming down, lately. | |
| 27 September 2009 | |
| Oh ouch I looked at the wrong measurement period for NUBIG didn't I. NUBIG would be the gain from purchase to date of conversion from C to S Corp. NUBIG can be reduced if current value has fallen below the conversion date value.
Tired and need to shut the brain down for a few hours. Night night Harry. | |
| 28 September 2009 | |
| Lr, what do you mean by "expenses related to research and cost related to the purchase of land" ?
Desribe those expenses for us. Your client did not buy land, he bought stock. | |


