Discussion:CSED and Installment Agreements
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> CSED and Installment Agreements
| 21 July 2007 | |
| Hello to all who help us here. I am merely a taxpayer looking for guidance and not a professional.
I have SFR's filed for tax years 1994, 1995 and 1996. I don't have a transcript and can't get one in the time allowed. I have to file 433F by 7/25 Question 1. Does an Installment Agreement extend the CSED? Question 2. If I now file a return for 1994, 1995, 1996 and request audit reconsideration does this extend CSED? Thank you Any help would be greatly appreciated | |
| 21 July 2007 | |
| 1 NO, unless it is part of an OIC or Chapter 13 bankruptcy
2 NO, but it is highly recommended in order to get the Statute for Assessment started | |
| 21 July 2007 | |
| Thank you Kevinh5 for the quick response.
I was told in another post: If the Service files returns under 6020(b), the deficiency procedures must be followed. Sometime after the 90 days have expired, the Service will ASSESS the tax calculated on the SFR. The 10 year collection statute then runs from that day of THAT particular assessment. The "real" return is not required to start the process ultimately concluding in the assessment. I want to be careful not to extend the IRS statute further into the future. | |
| 21 July 2007 | |
| Yes, but in the post I linked to above, I warn that an additional assessment for that year could be made at any time if a return has not been filed. You need to file the missing returns EVEN IF you agree with the IRS' assessment, in my opinion. This is "belt and suspenders" protection.
Although in your post and answer by Riley Discussion:Report of Accounts, he says the CSED has never begun. We all hate to disagree with him, although a few of us have at one time or another. | |
| 21 July 2007 | |
| Kevinh5
I am 60 years old, have only 5(or less) years of work left in me. I have a tax debt of nearly $40,000 dollars. The debt is one year of that income. I am, in part, basing my question again on the post of NYEA: Based on the §6020(b), it is possible, though probably almost a zero probability, that the Service could come back sometime in the future with another assessment from one of those years. But the reality is - it doesn't happen Are there some risks I'm not aware of? I'm not only here to ask questions but also to learn | |
| 21 July 2007 | |
| RBL, I'm not sure what you are implying. Will you cease to live after 5 years? Or will you retire and have some type of pension, 401(k), IRA, or Social Security income to live on? If so, then the collection could go on based on Riley's post. The IRS can levy Social Security benefits, although they usually try to collect through all other means first.
I would file the missing returns. AND, I would be considering an Offer In Compromise, using paid professional assistance. $40,000 is a decent income in many parts of the US, so you should be able to afford good representation. | |
| 21 July 2007 | |
| I will have a modest pension. I don't have any assets and am at present with no funds for professional help.
Why an OIC and not just a plain Installment Agreement? | |
| 21 July 2007 | |
| An OIC may get it over sooner rather than later. That way you can go on with your life. | |
| 22 July 2007 | |
| You can have a taxpayer service rep. at 800-829-1040 tell you on the phone what the CSEDs are. That info. isn't secret. Many taxpayers may know of a 10-year statute of limitations on collection but don't know of it's name or technicalities as you do. I would like to add that, if the the result IRS's analysis of monthly income available to pay your federal tax debt won't fully pay your debt by the expiration of the CSED, you'll have a partial pay installment agreement which might be a more palatable (even doable) option than a lump-sum or even a short-term offer. -- Larry Hess, CPA | Albuquerque, NM | Talk to me | |
| 22 July 2007 | |
| Under Sec. 6501(c)(3), the collections period for a return that the taxpayer never filed is forever (although the SOL is 10-years from assessment if no court proceeding is initiated).
Thus, I always recommend filing a real return. Also, taxes on an SFR are not dischargeable in bankruptcy. Back to your new question. The Service’s current position is that the original assessment on the SFR starts the 10-year collections statute, and the “real return” filed by the taxpayer after the deficiency assessment does not start a new 10-year collection period. See CCA 200149032. | |
| 22 July 2007 | |
| There isn't enough information to answer Rblsmith1's question. If you are filing a return to reduce the tax owed, go ahead and file it. If there is no reduction, I do not recommend filing an Original to Replace the SFR. I believe routinely filing returns to replace SFR's is silly. In addition, SFR's ARE dischargeable in a Chapter 13 providing they meet the other tests. They are not dischargeable in a Chapter 7. | |
| 22 July 2007 | |
| I was under the impression that BAPCPA (the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) eliminated the Chapter 13 Super-Discharge. I believe the 5 rules for discharge that apply in Chapter 7 now apply to discharge in Chapter 13.
I concur with Riley - the taxes on an SFR are not dischargeable (unless of course, the taxpayer has afixed his/her signature to the SFR to make it their return) | |
| 22 July 2007 | |
| Rblsmith1
Perhaps this snip from CCA 200149032 will lend some credence to what I posted in a different thread. Caps added for emphasis. From United States v. Updike, 281 U.S. 489 (1930), clarifies that section 6501(b)(3) does not affect the collection statute in section 6502. The Court in Updike, ruled that once the Service ASSESSED a liability against a taxpayer, where the taxpayer did not file a return, the six-year (now ten-year) statute of limitations on collection began. The Court stated, “[w]here, in a 'no return' case, an assessment, which under paragraph (a), may be made at any time, has IN FACT BEEN MADE, proceeding to collect must be begun within six years thereafter; but where there has been no assessment, the proceeding may be begun at any time.” Thus, the exception listed in section 6501(b)(3), in reference to collection, applies only to the statute of limitations as provided in section 6501(a) for the collection of tax before an assessment is made. The collection statute in section 6502 is ten years from the date of any assessment; it does not matter that the assessment is related to a section 6020(b) return. | |
| 22 July 2007 | |
| Thank you all for the response. This is very helpful information here and I really appreciate the input.
I will call and get CSED info in the morning. Filing "real" returns would reduce the tax owed by about 1/3. I do have the income to pay the entire amount over 5 years or less. I guess what I'm looking for is a pay plan that will not extend but allow the tax owed to drop off during the payment period. Is there such an animal? | |
| 23 July 2007 | |
| Yes, the Service cannot force you to extend the collection statute. | |
| 23 July 2007 | |
| I believe that the new Chapter 13 discharge rules preclude a discharge if the return was filed under 6020(b) [SFR Returns]. However, I believe that the 6020(a) returns would qualify for discharge. | |
| 23 July 2007 | |
| I work with a very good BK attorney that teaches at the Santa Clara University School of Law. I'll contact him. If I'm wrong, I'll post it. | |
| 2 August 2007 | |
| I am indeed wrong. The old Chapter 13 rules no longer apply meaning that SFR'd returns cannot be discharged in a Chapter 13. Thank you Riley2 for bringing this to my attention. | |
| 2 August 2007 | |
| You don't mention if the balance due is for one year or multiple years. I suggest calling IRS and getting a transcript of your account. This will show a "Tax Adj" on the date(s) the tax was assessed. The collection statute runs out 10 years from that date. If there is a significant gap between the oldest and the newest assessment, send your check in your plain envelope designating the payment to the newest assessment (Apply check to Form 1040 for xxxx). This will keep the IRS computer happy while the oldest assessment marches towards the statute expiration date.
If you can lower the liability, you should certainly file a correct return. It will not change the statute dates but will show up on the record as a reduction in the original tax and penalty. | |


