Discussion:Bank Interest after S-Corp Final Tax Year?
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Bank Interest after S-Corp Final Tax Year?
| 5 January 2008 | |
| An S-Corp received $25 in Bank interest after the Final Tax year.
Who reports this interest (and how)? | |
| 7 January 2008 | |
| Anyone?
How is any residual bank interest reported after the Final Tax Year (and Corp Dissolved per Form 966)? Note that the Bank Interest belongs to one of the shareholders, but was incorrectly allocated to the Corp due to a clerical error. | |
| 7 January 2008 | |
| Viking, for $25 I'd just report it on the shareholders' 1040 and forget about it. Seems like as good a way as any. I don't know of any "rule" on this, but maybe if my answer is "wrong" it will bring the s-corp gurus out of the woodwork;-)
When you say "incorrectly allocated" do you mean that the bank put the corp's EIN number on the 1099 instead of the shareholder's? How about getting the bank to correct the error? | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 8 January 2008 |
| Sounds reasonable to me | |
| 9 January 2008 | |
| "Incorrectly allocated"
The shareholder had a personal account at the same bank and accidentally made a transfer into the corporation account rather than to the personal account close to the end of the year. The bank put a hold on the funds until several days into the next year. During the hold time, the bank did not allow the funds to be moved to the personal account or allow the Corp account to be closed on Dec 31 when the Corp dissolved. Thus, because of the hold, interest was generated in the Corp account for a few days in the year following the "official" dissolution. | |
| 9 January 2008 | |
| I would put it on the personal return and attach a statement to the 1040 or even on the Schedule B line. If a corporate return were prepared, the K1 would ultimately place the interest on the shareholder's B anyway. I'm sure IRS would take that fact into consideration. | |
Phil Moody (talk|edits) said: | 9 January 2008 |
| Up until about 2 years ago, I would have agreed with the above, not file, add to stockholder etc. But now with all the potential penalties, failure to file penalties, failure to give K-1s, etc. I would file the 1120S.
I think you could spend more time in responding to notices, and trying to abate penalties than actually filing the return, and get it over with. I would do this, even if I was unable to charge for it. | |
| 9 January 2008 | |
| If undesirous to ignore it, report on 1040, no attached explanation needed. IRS simply will not send out a notice to anybody over a $25 1099. | |
| 9 January 2008 | |
| Phil Moody,
Filing the 1120S for a year after the Final Tax year would complicate things. For example, startup expenses were only allowed to be deducted in the Final Tax year. If the subsequent year is filed, it would then become the final year, and the previous deductions would be disallowed in original Final year (but apply to the new year of course). Furthermore, CA would want another $800 in minimum Franchise tax... Finally, can/should a dissolved corporation, that is not doing business, file a return? Note that, as far I understand, receiving bank interest is not considered doing business. | |
| 9 January 2008 | |
| If a corporation has been dissolved, it cannot legally file anything, no? There's no officer authorized to sign the return. :-0 | |
| 10 January 2008 | |
| TxSrv,
This actually brings up an interesting point (I am also posting this in a separate post!): When is an S-Corporation Dissolved for Federal Purposes? As far as I understand, the Corporation is dissolved when the Corporation board decides that it is dissolved? For Federal purposes, form 966 is filed to alert IRS to this fact (within 30 days of decision to dissolve), and the final Tax return must then be filed within 3.5 month after the dissolution date. For CA State (Franchise Tax board) the final Tax return must be filed on the regular due date + extension (i.e. Oct 15). The Corporation then has up to 1 year after filing the final return to file the Certificate of Dissolution with the SOS. For example: Corporation declares dissolution on Dec 31, 2007. Form 966 is filed before Jan 30, 2008. Final 1120S filed on or before April 15, 2008 (Final Tax Year 2007). Final 100S (CA return) filed on or before Oct 15, 2008 (Final Tax Year 2007). Certificate of Dissolution filed on or before Oct 15, 2009.
| |
Michaelstar (talk|edits) said: | 10 January 2008 |
| Viking - I would consider filing the 1120S (or extension) by 03/15/2008 and if extended by 09/15/2008 and not use the dates you listed above or you might have yourself t/r's that are delinquent. | |
Phil Moody (talk|edits) said: | 10 January 2008 |
| TxSrv, I don't have the cites, but as far as I know, the IRS doesn't care if the corp has been dissolved, unless it has been done in accordance with IRS regulations. Its quite common for states to administratively revoke the charter of corps that do not pay corporate franchise fees (in Missouri they call this administratively dissolved). As far as the IRS, the filing and taxing continues to roll on.
And to paraphrase a recent poster: closely held corporate minutes, I laugh at. or something to that effect. Viking, I know the problems you state. All I am saying is that if advise is given not to file a return, when one is required, I think this shifts potential problems from the taxpayer to the advise giver. For one, I am not willing to accept this burden. | |
| 10 January 2008 | |
| Michaelstar,
Yes, the date should have been 3/15/08 or 4/15/08 if extension was filed (Max 3.5 months after dissolution for final return). | |
| 10 January 2008 | |
| I can't believe some are saying an 1120-S is to be filed to report $25, and then bill the client. It is true that IRS can accept it (section 6020 I think), but an entity which doesn't exist has no obligation to file a corp return nor can IRS enforce its filing. In fact, in the case of any S-Corp (with no tax liability), IRS cannot enforce its filing with any weapon which necessarily costs you money. It merely proposes taxing a 1040 with its version of computed income.
If there's corporate income which got missed, it's simply taxable to whoever (on 1040 in the case here) got it, under section 61. Does we seriously think IRS will even launch an examination involving a related corp over a $25 1099? A CP-2000 is an examination, with indirect cost implications. | |
| 10 January 2008 | |
| SCORP Files Dissolution with state and final return with Feds. The SCORP no longer exist. The $25 interest is immaterial to file another 1120-S. File it with the 1040. | |


