Discussion:Are surrogate expenses deductible?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Are surrogate expenses deductible?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Are surrogate expenses deductible?

BLJOLLEY (talk|edits) said:

15 February 2008
I hope someone can help me out on this. I have client's (husband & wife) that has gone through the in vitro fertilization process and it has been unsuccessful. Now they have decided to use a surrogate. My question is, are the costs paid to the surrogate deductible? How about the medical expenses and the personal expenses for the surrogate?

Sandysea (talk|edits) said:

15 February 2008
If the surrogate is otherwise a dependent it would be deductible but if not, I don't think so

MikeDongo (talk|edits) said:

15 February 2008
Previous discussion

http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:Surrogate_Mom

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

16 February 2008
I see no problem with deducting the surrogate fee. However, the medical expenses are nondeductible.

Taxea (talk|edits) said:

16 February 2008
Riley2..our main man...are you sure because I thought I just read that only the medical costs are deductible taxea

RoyDaleOne (talk|edits) said:

16 February 2008
If the egg and sperm belong to the taxpayer I would suggest you take the position that the fetus also belongs to them and therefore the medical expenses paid prior to birth were deductible. This position maybe in conflict which the State Statutes covering who is the mother(parent). Medical expenses paid after the fetus becomes a dependent of the taxpayer (when ever that is) are deductible, regardless of when incurred. As for as the rest I don't know.

NYEA (talk|edits) said:

16 February 2008
From RIA, FOIA documents - IRS Info 2004-0187

A snip states:

A surrogate mother is not the taxpayer or the taxpayer= s (sic) spouse, and typically is not the type of relative listed in § 152(a). The surrogate mother usually is neither a member of the taxpayer's household for the entire taxable year, nor receives over half her support from the taxpayer for that year, and thus does not qualify as a non-relative dependent. Nor is an unborn child a dependent. Cassman v. United States, 31 Fed. Cl. 121 (1994). Thus, medical expenses paid for a surrogate mother and her unborn child generally would not qualify for deduction under § 213(a).

RoyDaleOne (talk|edits) said:

16 February 2008
Pub 502

ADOPTED CHILD. A legally adopted child is treated as your own child. This child includes a child lawfully placed with you for legal adoption.

  You can include medical expenses that you paid for a child before 

adoption, if the child qualified as your dependent when the medical services were provided or when the expenses were paid.

  If you pay back an adoption agency or other persons for medical 

expenses they paid under an agreement with you, you are treated as having paid those expenses provided you clearly substantiate that the payment is directly attributable to the medical care of the child.

  But if you pay the agency or other person for medical care that was 

provided and paid for before adoption negotiations began, you cannot include them as medical expenses.


    TIP! You may be able to take a credit for other expenses related to 
    an adoption. See the INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM 8839, for more 
    information.

BLJOLLEY (talk|edits) said:

21 February 2008
Thank you for your help. It seems like a thin line no matter what position you would take.

Thanks again.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums