Discussion:ASTPS - Anyone a Member

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> ASTPS - Anyone a Member
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> ASTPS - Anyone a Member

Tonymontana (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
Is anyone a member of ASTPS (American Society of Tax Problem Solvers) www.astps.org

If so, what do you think of the association?

Is it worth it?

Are the seminars worth it?

Thanks

Tonymontana (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
Never mind. I used the little yellow box on the left and got my answers.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
The Yellow Box, not the Yellow Box. don't you realize that every time you use the yellow box a kitten dies. Please, do not use the Yellow box.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
I don't do any kind of heavy duty representation like Irsfixer and Skass do, but I think this whole thing is going to backfire if too many new people get into it.

On a short trip I made about a month ago to pick up my computer out of the shop, I must have heard 3 radio commercials from 3 different national tax outfits doing this. Do this many Americans have tax problems to rise to this level?

You get that many calls, and you are likely to start taking cases that should be turned down, or taking peoples money with no hope of success. Something similar happened in the debt counseling field.

Then, the first thing you know, the IRS will start asking Congress to restrict all these progams, or do what they can do through rulemaking. Of course, the legitimate practitioners and people with legitimate problems will get hurt the most.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
I am a Marxist(Groucho Division): I would never join any organization that would have me as a member.

Tonymontana (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
I meant the "Jello Box".

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
I suspect many of these quasi-trade groups are formed by individuals who could not make a living actually doing the activities they promote. I do not belong to any of them - and never will.

The main problem this area of practice faces is from those that have a solution in search of a problem. They sell a product and not professional services designed to solve IRS problems. The recent decision against JKH illustrates this as well as anything can. Only a small fraction of people with IRS problems are OIC candidates, but if your commission is based on OIC's, it is OIC's you will promote. Hopefully, the IRS's current hard line on Offers will weed the shoe salesmen out of the business.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
Fred, using the yellow box SAVES the kittens. Not using it is what costs so many lives.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
Crow, as far as representation goes, any Circular 230 practitioner CAN represent a client, the issue is whether they SHOULD. As Steve K or IRSFixer or anyone else who knows what they are doing will tell you, a representative who doesn't know what he is doing can be worse than no representation at all. In other words, if you aren't going to learn (not at your client's expense) how to be good, you don't want to do it. That is why many people refer OICs and other complex representation issues to specialists.

As far as how much representation is needed: you would indeed be surprised at how many people have tax problems. We get several calls per week, half of which show up for their appointments and half again as many do I take on as clients. I can tell you that it is year-round work, but it is VERY emotionally draining. And you never are hired until the last minute, so you had better be ready and able to JUMP otherwise you have to turn down the engagement.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

17 June 2008
I agree, any one of them can do it, and many do in the regular course of their practice and very appropriately (audits, appeals etc). I was thinking of some of these jumping on the bandwagon (radio/tv ads) now claiming to pull rabbits out of hats and that sort of thing.

There's some lawyer group TV ad running now in Atlanta, and I know it's all bull. I'd guess most of them on there are full of it. Then, you look at our Yellow Pages under lawyers/tax rep, and you find a couple of guys that have been doing this for years, and are very experienced. Hope the public is wise enough to see the difference, but they'll usually go with the TV every time.

I should also add that there are many professionals that are capable of doing OIC's and Innocent Spouse, all sorts of things. Kevin, you being one of them of course, and many others on here. I just have a strong feeling that many are getting into this with absolutely no grounding or experience in tax law: especially the lawyers jumping into it. You can't size up one of these cases if you don't have some experience, and I'm certainly not claiming to have it.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
I rent space that I use 12 days a year from a consumer bankruptcy specialist. The person who screens their calls and sets up appointments tells me that sometimes the best solution is Chapter 13, even under the new bankruptcy laws, where these tax debts are listed and a payment plan hammered out, and for far less in fees than the quasi-specialist will charge [by this I mean the JKHs of the world].

We were watching Steven Spielberg's 'Catch Me If You Can' on dvd last night. I was struck by the fact that father Christopher Walken was constantly having problems with IRS.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
Oh I love that movie! what a con job!

Mscash (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
I do primarily representation in the collection area and have never heard of this organization and don't feel like I am alone. If the pros haven't heard of it, I suspect it won't attract too many potential clients. On the other hand, I surfed through the site and note that there are some fairly stringent education and experience requirments. There was also a testimonial from the president of my EA society chapter.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
my take on the organization was that they were looking for people who, for one reason or another, didn't qualify or didn't want to attend NAEA's 3 year NTPI

Skasselea (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
One of ASTPS (American Society of Tax Problem Solvers) primary pitches, is that you will qualify to become a Certified Tax Resolution Specialist (http://www.astps.org/ctrs.html). Only one problem with that. It is a violation of Circ 230 for EA's to use the term Certified (unless they are also a CPA, of course). Of course, getting NAEA off their butts to do anything has been impossible over the last several years.

ยง 10.30 Solicitation.

(a) Advertising and solicitation restrictions.

Enrolled agents, in describing their professional designation, may not utilize the term of art "certified" or imply an employer/employee relationship with the Internal Revenue Service.

Tonymontana (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
The only reason I asked about them is because I received a brochure in the mail marketing the "IRS Resolution Boot Camp" seminar. Sounded interesting, so I thought I'd check them out.

I don't plan to market for this type of business. But every once in a while I do run into someone who needs representation. It doesn't hurt to know how to effectively represent.

For me, it's more a question of time and money. Can this association really put on a seminar that's worthwhile or am I just wasting my time on stuff I already know.

Irsfixer (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
Well, it is a little like going to an all day seminar on estate planning because every once in a while someone asks you about it. It is a good start if you intend to focus in that area but is a waste of time for dabbling.

Tonymontana (talk|edits) said:

18 June 2008
Good point Irsfixer.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums