Discussion:1041-Complex Trust Rental Loss Pas Through to K-1?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> 1041-Complex Trust Rental Loss Pas Through to K-1?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> 1041-Complex Trust Rental Loss Pas Through to K-1?

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Greetings-

I am not the sharpest tool in the 1041 shed. I need help~

I have a new Trust Client. 1st year of trust and after reading the entire trust document several times over I can positively state it is a Revocable Living Trust. Grantor died last year. However the categorization of Simple or Complex is not stated in the document. Further the discussion of distributions is not specifically stated.

So I have come to the conclusion (perhaps incorrectly) I can pick Complex....because we like the idea of the flexibility of not having to distribute income every year and having the trust bear the burden of taxation. Any dissenting opinions?

Further; in year one the trust; which holds rental property had $8k in rental losses. Executor participates actively. These losses are flowing through to the K-1-offestting some income on his 1040. Cool

However; lets say in year 2 the rental property operates at a gain. Can we hold the income at the trust level and pay taxes at the trust 1041 level and not distribute this income over on the K-1's?


I appreciate your time and advice

Edcosoft (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
A. You can't hold back one type of income and distribute another.

B. A trust runs out of its 15% tax bracket at $2,300 of ordinary income making it not too attractive to fail to distribute. C.You don't "pick" Complex. If the trust instrument directs that all income be distributed, it's a Simple trust, otherwise its Complex, and if you fail to distribute all the income from a Simple Trust it becomes a Complex Trust that year.( there's a couple of other reservations) D. The only difference is that a Simple Trust gets a $300 exemption instead of $100 for a Complex Trust.

ed

WesR (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Hi both of you need to take a trust course. Passive losses in a trust cannot be passed thru to the benes they are trapped in the trust. That is why you never want rental property in a trust. (NOT "cool") A simple trust is deemed to pass out the income whether it physically does or doesnt.  :) bye

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Ill take the insightful and helpful portion of you comment WesR and disregard the sarcasm. I am sure WesR is as busy and grouchy as I am so this is COOL~

What I think WesR failed to read was the fact that the executor/beneficiary participates actively in the rental venture held in trust. Active participation in a rental activity allows for pass through of the rental losses from 1041 level to the personal 1040 level. Executor is not a R/E agent, however he manages the rental property full time.

At the personal (1040) level on the Sch E one must indicate that the taxpayer participates actively for the losses to flow through to page one of the 1040.

Any dissenting opinions?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
I think it matters whether a §645 election has been made, SpicoliCPA. Otherwise, WesR is correct on every part of his post. You seem to be using the term 'executor' for a trust, which indicates more CPE might be helpful. You are given credit for the fact that you admitted this in the first sentence of your OP.

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
EdCosoft wrote "You can't hold back one type of income and distribute another."

I understand this statement, however if this is a complex trust and we hold back ALL types of income/losses one year and elect to distribute ALL types of income/losses in a subsequent year is this allowed?

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Thanks Kevin~ (I was honest in stating my level of expertise)

Question: You are stating that active participation by the trustees in the rental real estate venture that is generating a loss prevents pass through of this rental loss on the K-1's issued by the trust?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
I'm saying that a trust is treated differently from the first two years of an estate with regard to active participation rentals.

which is what WesR was saying also.

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Okay-

Can you provide a link of reference to help me gain more insight. I can do the heavy lifting if you point in the right direction?

Do I need to file 645 election to take advantage of the rental losses or is this impossible?

Bottom line: Is your opinion that Taxwise 1041 is prepared incorrectly if these rental losses are flowing through to the K-1's?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
it is not the software's fault for the outcome, it is the fault of the input

you don't make the §645 election, the trustee of the trust (in conjunction with the executor of the estate, if any) make the election with the input of their tax professional. This election should be convered at length in any 1041 preparation class, as there are several pros and cons that have to be weighed out.

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
There is a difference between conceited obfuscation; and a genuine desire to enlighten. Please dont "assist" me any further Kevin.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
from my user page:

If my answers to your questions seem curt, it is because it is much better for you to learn how to research and find your own answers than to depend upon others. The others could be wrong. If your profile indicates that you are a beginner, I tend to give quite a bit of slack, but if you have been practicing for several years or are an Enrolled Agent or CPA, then I do expect you to know how to find and read an IRS Publication and the instructions for a form.

We all have to start with zero knowledge and learn more every year. But I think it is malpractice to take on a client for which you don't have the necessary education to help them and don't have the time to get that education before completing their return. Don't do estates or S corp returns until you have taken an estate or S corp class, or at least purchased and read some CPE material on the topic. The same for representation. If you don't have the experience, then get the education at your own cost, don't practice on your clients, you will probably do more harm than good. The IRS instructions are a start, but they really aren't enough, otherwise everyone could do their own taxes and no one would need your expertise. If you are unwilling to take the necessary CPE to become proficient on a topic, then either turn the client away or get professional help to review your work.

I expect my fellow tax professionals to be true professionals. If you aren't willing to spend the time studying and taking CPE, then you should get out of this business. On the other hand, if you are willing to share what you have already researched but still have further questions, I'll be more than willing to help you.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Try googling 'advantages of 645 election' for a start.

1TaxPro (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
If this is the second year of the trust it may be too late for the 645 election.

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
It is the 2nd year of the trust,

The Grantor died on 7/7/07. Beneficiary filed a 1041 for 2007 and checked the box "decedents estate". He did not account for the real estate loss at all. He paper filed the tax return "stubby pencil"

I am thinking I must amend year one to account for the rental loss and file year 2 (2008) as well.

I think its too late to file the 645?

1TaxPro (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
In the military, they had a word for this: SNAFU

there seems to be confusion as to whether this is an estate or a trust - you say you've read the trust instrument but your client filed an estate return. Maybe he made the 645 election 'stubby pencil'?

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Another military term "FUBAR" comes to mind.:O)

On the paper filed 2007 return client did not check the box that states "Check here if filing trust made Section 645 election". I am certain he did not file a 645 election with the IRS.

CLARIFICATION: This is a revocable living trust that is now irrivocable as the grantor has expired.

Where does that leave me?

WesR (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Hi man you guys know how to beat a dead horse. Sp you stated a TRUST NOT an ESTATE so stick to the facts. An ESTATE can use the $25k rule for two years after death A TRUST cannot check out 469(j)(12) tells you that suspended losses trapped in a trust/estate get added to BASIS upon termination of the estate or trust. NOTHING shall be allowable as a deduction for any taxable year. Now be good boys and go home. And yes take a course:) bye

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
That is lazer clarity WesR. Thanks

SpicoliCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 March 2009
Good source for anyone who is ever in my position again:

Search the IRS Website: "Passive Activity Loss ATG - Exhibit 6.2: Trusts: Passive Loss Issues"

Link: http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=146842,00.html

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.